Professional workers like doctors, nurses and teachers make a greater contribution to society and so should be paid more than sports and entertainment personalities. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Nowadays, the phenomenon of paying more to professional workers and its corresponding impacts has attracted numerous controversies and drawn the attention from the public. Although contested by many that doctors, the matter of massive salaries is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. In my opinion, I am convinced to believe that increasing incomes of teachers, doctors and nurses could be a plus, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Form the social standpoint, paying increase for professional workers could provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that social welfare improvements, as well as important engagements are inextricably bound up. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I performed a academic experiment discovered social satisfactions. Thus, beneficial ramification of both this crucial phenomenon and accordingly predominant consequences apparently can be seen.
Moreover, another factor should be considered is the cultural aspect, which in other words, more paid salaries for professional workers rather that sport personalities would enhance the sense of responsibilities among them. As a tangible example, a recent research published on Scientist American revealed that nurses who are paid well have expressed better functions. Hence, it is correct to preconceived the notion of this remarkable method.
To conclude, while there are compelling arguments on both side, I profoundly hold the view that the benefits of increasing doctors and teachers salaries far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the do advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of ultimate satisfaction, but also pinpoint social achievements implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 321, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...I was a university student, I performed a academic experiment discovered social s...
^
Line 7, column 194, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the do advantages of this unique phenomenon pr...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
accordingly, also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1552.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.85660377358 5.00649968141 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32457755944 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 176.0 139.433497537 126% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664150943396 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 480.6 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.0718434766 50.4703680194 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 141.090909091 104.977214359 134% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.0 7.25397266985 152% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158975956159 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0485370645242 0.0925447433944 52% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0428460078394 0.071462118173 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0868753886685 0.151781067708 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0381487563494 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.61 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 55.0591133005 176% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.