Recently, the phenomenon of the environment and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that environmental issue highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that metropolitan area can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the poor quality of environment standpoint, the human life can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that limiting amount of carbon emission, as well as limiting the fossil fuel, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered the degradation of the environment. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both village and city can be seen.
Within the realm of reducing pollution, the international policy might increase the consequences of authorities contributions. Moreover, fundamental aspects of government policy relate to this reality that the demerits of pollution problem pertain to educating people. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of managing the home garbage is correlated negatively with natural disorders. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of reducing harmful pollutant.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of protecting environment far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being encouraged policy prove the significance of the green products, but also pinpoints of the biosphere implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.74708171206 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33867558803 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.661478599222 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 473.4 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.9171847218 50.4703680194 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 123.083333333 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4166666667 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0544820512921 0.242375264174 22% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0173257220341 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0211259444751 0.071462118173 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0302025094392 0.151781067708 20% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121426178606 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.07 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.07 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.