environmental problems are too great to be managed by indivituals so real change can only be achieved at government level.
to what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement ? support your point of view with reasons and/or examples from your own experience.
Over the past few decades, there has been ambivalence over whether environmental problems should be managed by governments or indivituals, and this elicits stimulating disputations among the public. While some cynics claim that the government should focusing on environmental problems, I sanguinely believe that both parties has equal responsibility for that.
Conspicuously, there are a myriad of reasons behind why governments should be focused to preserve environments. One of the most compelling reasons is that government allocate sufficient budget to control it . It also assign relevant budget to prevent environmental problem. Another cogent reason is that the government can persuade companies to consider advanced mechanism that is caused to environmental problem.
Despite these beliefs, there are other skeptics who conjecture that individuals can play key role to control these problems. Other aspects of this, people can choose recyclable materials to prevent environmental problems. Although it seems to be ostensibly veridical, this is the case because there has not ability to control everything they only can control their home around.
To recapitulate, the most persuasive arguments are the role of governments and individuals to preventing environmental problems . Therefore, I strongly agree that these two should be equal importance to control and maintain our environments.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 28, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...y for that. Conspicuously, there are a myriad of reasons behind why governments shoul...
^^^^^^
Line 2, column 206, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...allocate sufficient budget to control it . It also assign relevant budget to prev...
^^
Line 2, column 216, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ufficient budget to control it . It also assign relevant budget to prevent enviro...
^^
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'assigns'?
Suggestion: assigns
...ficient budget to control it . It also assign relevant budget to prevent environmenta...
^^^^^^
Line 4, column 128, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...als to preventing environmental problems . Therefore, I strongly agree that these ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, so, therefore, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1197.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 203.0 242.827586207 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.89655172414 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.77462671648 3.92707691288 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27205462415 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.610837438424 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 374.4 379.143842365 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8159268199 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.818181818 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4545454545 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.36363636364 7.25397266985 33% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.195329156976 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0774151826902 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0318765401951 0.071462118173 45% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.11999846405 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237146943474 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.94 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.74 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.