Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
Recently, the phenomenon of euthanasia and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that relieving intractable suffering highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being terminal ill can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From herbal remedies standpoint, hopelessness can provide the society with noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that life expectancy, as well as medical context, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which deciphered withdrawing medical aid. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both dying quickly and merciful death can be seen.
Within the realm of the volunteer death, happy death might increase the consequences of physical disorders. Moreover, fundamental aspects of lethargy relate to this reality that the demerits of suffering from chronic condition pertain to committing suicide. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of painless death is correlated negatively with devastating disease. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of incurable disease.
To conclude, while three are several compelling arguments of both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of murder far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of irreversible coma prove the significance of modern society, but also pinpoints of the sickness implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'remedies'' or 'remedy's'?
Suggestion: remedies'; remedy's
...t throughout this essay. From herbal remedies standpoint, hopelessness can provide th...
^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1402.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 243.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7695473251 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94822203886 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24185296741 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691358024691 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.0948810233 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.833333333 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0638266571535 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0198479910317 0.0925447433944 21% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.026572294481 0.071462118173 37% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0346305681659 0.151781067708 23% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0159096948418 0.0609392437508 26% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.26 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.