Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge in the trend to see prodigies discussing the fact that practical learning is more effective way to teach rather to focus on books. Critics, however, claim that bookish knowledge is required to maintain practical implication. I, personally believe that former argument is more realistic and worth to believe. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the view points to elaborate this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of argument associated with the trend of experimental learning versus bookish knowledge. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that books contain plethora of material to learn but on another hand practical learning along with theory is quiet helpful to deliver and seek knowledge. As a prime example, this trend of focusing on practical knowledge has been experienced since long time and their results are incredible in every field.
On the other hand, another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that experience learning is the best way to absorb maximum knowledge for longer duration. Therefore, it is helpful for career perspectives and also a key for knowledge acquisition.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that experience based learing is more beneficial in every aspect of learning. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefit would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 224, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...however, claim that bookish knowledge is required to maintain practical implicati...
^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...lieve. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the view points to elaborate this statement...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ne stem from the fact that books contain plethora of material to learn but on ano...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, so, therefore, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1192.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.44292237443 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85537495158 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625570776256 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.7449231234 50.4703680194 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.363636364 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.18181818182 7.25397266985 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130534118874 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0439166937425 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.059956648346 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0736779379059 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0402525714381 0.0609392437508 66% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.1 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.27 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.55 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.