In developing countries, tourism has disadvantages or advantages?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge amongst the prodigies discussing the fact that tourists industry is beneficial for underdeveloped nations or not. In my opinion, tourism is one of the most important aspect of developing nations to improve the nation’s economy. in this essay, I shall highlight some of the important aspects of this statement before deducing any conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that tourism has a lot of advantages for developing nations. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that tourists industry has a main role of utilizing natural beauty of the developing nation to provoke the tourists from all around the world. In addition, tourism provides the chance to see diversity of different cultures, norms and traditions. As a prime example, Thailand has one of the best tourists industry, where visitors visits throughout the year to enjoy breaths taking view of Pataya and other beautiful islands. Moreover, Thailand has made it’s name on the top most attracting tourists spot across the world.
Another, pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that besides promoting cultural diversity and tourism provides great opportunity to the set the trades between two nations. Therefore beneficial for every individual in terms of their career perspectives.
To recapitulate, foregoing discussion propounds that tourism not only beneficial for nations economy but also promotes relationship between them. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 91, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
... the prodigies discussing the fact that tourists industry is beneficial for underdevelop...
^^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 277, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: In
...s to improve the nation's economy. in this essay, I shall highlight some of t...
^^
Line 1, column 310, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...onomy. in this essay, I shall highlight some of the important aspects of this statement bef...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 185, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...onspicuous one stems from the fact that tourists industry has a main role of utilizing n...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 475, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'tourists'' or 'tourist's'?
Suggestion: tourists'; tourist's
...e example, Thailand has one of the best tourists industry, where visitors visits through...
^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 544, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...tors visits throughout the year to enjoy breaths taking view of Pataya and other ...
^^
Line 3, column 178, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...the set the trades between two nations. Therefore beneficial for every individual in term...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, firstly, if, moreover, so, therefore, in addition, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 241.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55186721992 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94007293032 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91381455302 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622406639004 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.7169213652 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.5 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0833333333 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.58333333333 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.14172406595 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0522735702272 0.0925447433944 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0724375881092 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0746615064653 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0354655024029 0.0609392437508 58% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.