Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
The topic of experience-based learning has become a heated debate among academics. Although many people assert that it is beneficial for students future, others refute this proposal saying that theory is always important. This essay will discuss why experience more important than books reading and reach a logical conclusion.
There are myriads of arguments why practical skills are necessary for pupils in which the most preponderant one is that it will build confidence in youngsters to interact with the outside world. Furthermore, it will excel communication skills and give good social relationship to juveniles which cannot be obtained through traditional studies. For instance, a study showed that students who have experimental learning do well in their professional careers. Hence, practical experience is a precursor for a fruitful future.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument would be that practical education always enhance interpersonal abilities of students. Moreover, students who do training and internships infirm would have a better understanding of how to find a job. For example, a survey revealed that about 80% of the employees in every company are those children who had experience in the industry during their study. Consequently, this is why people gravitate towards this trend.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the advantages of practical experience over book studies in terms of building confidence and increasing interpersonal skills for students. Therefore, in my opinion, academics should support students for training and internships during their study period.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 419, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to do'
Suggestion: to do
...students who have experimental learning do well in their professional careers. Hen...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, therefore, well, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1371.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 239.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73640167364 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93187294222 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06653173528 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 148.0 139.433497537 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619246861925 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.0211713057 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.461538462 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3846153846 20.9669160288 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.23076923077 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0776087931553 0.242375264174 32% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0317162414897 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0471025032447 0.071462118173 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0548673449603 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0391466925049 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 53.1260098522 68% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.01 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.32886699507 117% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.