extreme sports

Essay topics:

extreme sports

Recently, the phenomenon of life-threatening sports and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that facing up the challenges are highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that overcome fears can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.

From a social standpoint, adventurous sports can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that trying new occasion, as well as workout, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered N. Thus, beneficial ramifications of cure and mental apparently can be seen.

Within the realm of science, disturb body might increase the consequences of balance. Moreover, fundamental aspects of N relate to this reality that the demerits of leading to accidents pertain to addiction to the sport. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of N is correlated negatively with mental features. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of N.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of being keen on exciting experiences far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of developing self-confidence prove the significance of universal interest, but also pinpoint making money implications

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1341.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 242.0 242.827586207 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.54132231405 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.94415379849 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33184203828 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.690082644628 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 425.7 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.4232240729 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.75 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.1666666667 20.9669160288 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.087819656838 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0279842100814 0.0925447433944 30% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0492821947174 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0470693240835 0.151781067708 31% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0272990229852 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.85 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.7 8.32886699507 128% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 55.0591133005 169% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.