Foreign visitors should pay more than local visitors for cultural and historical attractions. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
In this globalized era, people take more chances to travel abroad and to visit the famous places. There are many people who is travelling to foreign countries and more of the foreign visitors are coming to India to experience culture, but their cost of living varies from local people to foreign tourists. This essay will discuss is it necessary to charge more from foreigners than local people.
At the outset, there are myriad of reasons why governments are charging more amount from the foreigners who visit our country for historical and cultural attractions. On of the main reason is that, the value of money varies from one country to another. For instance,, the dollar value may change a lot from the Indian rupees and it will be less for the foreigners while they are spending more than we change from them. Moreover, the living expense is more in the foreign countries and they can easily afford the amount charged by the government for the leisure activities.
On the other hand, there is a colossal upsurge on the charging of more money from the foreigners are opposed by some prodigies is controversial. They allege that we need to consider them as our guests and should not do anything unfair as they consider the same in their country.
In conclusion, there are lots of merits and demerits of these arguments. In my opinion, the economic growth of the country is dependent on the tourism and leisure activities we provide. Local people they spend a percentage of amount by their taxes and they have the rights to get the facilities by their country in an affordable price, so governments can charge more than local tourists for foreign tourist.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 127, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ous places. There are many people who is travelling to foreign countries and more...
^^
Line 3, column 47, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... outset, there are myriad of reasons why governments are charging more amount fro...
^^
Line 3, column 267, Rule ID: DOUBLE_PUNCTUATION
Message: Two consecutive commas
Suggestion: ,
...rom one country to another. For instance,, the dollar value may change a lot from ...
^^
Line 5, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... activities. On the other hand, there is a colossal upsurge on the charging of...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, may, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 4.85263157895 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.53935232871 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.501754385965 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 432.0 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1647863636 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.75 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.66666666667 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.237080403939 0.242375264174 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0859907482815 0.0925447433944 93% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0601287222935 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.138745016729 0.151781067708 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.050052559322 0.0609392437508 82% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.15 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.