Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student's performance. Continual assessment such as
coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this.
Recently, written examinations have sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "is it advantageous or not?". Whereas it is a widely held view that continuous assessment such as coursework and projects are beneficial. I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the educational standpoint, a written course is bound up inextricably with effective assessment, which indicates they lead to both the learning process and schools' policies. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2016 demonstrates the relationship between practical courses and theoretical lessons as well as an exponential increase in students' performance. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of formal exams is positively correlated with not only fair examinations but also pre-prepared papers.
Within the realm of psychology, without the slightest doubt, formal assessments attribute to stress, in that it would come down to cognitive skills, talent-intensive skills, and higher education. A salient example of such attribution is universities progression, which is a cause of concern since it was mistaken to take nervous disorder for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars have had the opportunity to pinpoint test-taking strategies problems. Likewise, hardly had they confined their attention to anxiety, time pressure, and even undone assignments. Hence, it is correct to infer the pivotal role of course works.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes "all's well that ends well," after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that both formal examinations and continual assessment are essential to examine students knowledge. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-11-12 | elise1234 | 80 | view |
| 2019-10-12 | Roshanip | 77 | view |
| 2018-10-18 | brandnewiman | 11 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | mohsen j | 88 | view |
| 2018-03-15 | karan81093 | 55 | view |
- The three pie charts below show the cahnges in annual spending by a particular UK school in 1981 1991 and 2001 Summerise the information by selecting and reportingthe main features and make caomparsions where relevant 40
- As cities expanding some people believe the government should look forward to creating better networks of public transportation available for everyone rather than building more roads for vehicle owning population. What's your opinion? Give some examples o 88
- Parents should be held legally responsible for the actions of their children. Do you agree with this opinion? Support your position with your own study, experience or observations. 88
- There are more men or women in certain jobs and there s nothing we can change about it Do you agree with that 84
- The cashless society is becoming a reality. More and more people are using credit cards for payment, and fewer people use cash. How realistic do you think it is? And do you think it is beneficial or problematic? 77
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 78, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...ying goes 'alls well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, hence, however, if, likewise, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, of course, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.90526315789 5.00649968141 118% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29787978561 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.691228070175 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 60.5786720736 50.4703680194 120% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.214285714 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3571428571 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.42857142857 7.25397266985 116% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0636213282531 0.242375264174 26% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0171993507683 0.0925447433944 19% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0214351394798 0.071462118173 30% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.03685801759 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0133656126567 0.0609392437508 22% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.0 11.5310837438 147% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 55.0591133005 211% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.