Formal examinations are the only effective way to assess a student’s performance. Continual assessment such as coursework and projects is not a satisfactory way to do this.To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?

Recently the phenomenon of effective way for assessment and it is corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and consequently positive of substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that satisfactory way for assessment can be a plus, and I will analyze all over this essay.
From a social standpoint, examination for student's performance can be provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues and international students are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment with discovered current policy. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both university education and social responsibility apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena, coursework and projects not effective ways might increase the consequences of alternative education styles. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of distinctive basis relate to this reality that the demerits of ultimate outcomes pertain to .As a tangible example some scientific research undertaken to prestigious university has asserted that the downside of encouragement activity apparently negatively of curriculum activity. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of faculty attitude .
To conclude, while there are several arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of far outweigh it is drawbacks. Not only to advantages of this unique phenomenon prove to significance of university loan.

Votes
Average: 8.8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ursework and projects not effective ways might increase the consequences of alter...
^^
Line 3, column 270, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...demerits of ultimate outcomes pertain to .As a tangible example some scientific r...
^^
Line 3, column 271, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...emerits of ultimate outcomes pertain to .As a tangible example some scientific re...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_WHITESPACE
Message: Add a space between sentences
Suggestion: As
...erits of ultimate outcomes pertain to .As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Line 3, column 273, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...erits of ultimate outcomes pertain to .As a tangible example some scientific rese...
^^
Line 3, column 535, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... preconceived notion of faculty attitude . To conclude, while there are several a...
^^
Line 4, column 104, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... profoundly believe that the benefits of far outweigh it is drawbacks. Not only t...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, consequently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, while

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1417.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.78367346939 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.32997302368 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665306122449 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 474.3 379.143842365 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2096594785 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.818181818 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.2727272727 20.9669160288 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.63636363636 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 5.33497536946 131% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196816402865 0.242375264174 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0651545363319 0.0925447433944 70% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0595426708512 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.101496675767 0.151781067708 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046577105416 0.0609392437508 76% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 23.77 53.1260098522 45% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.54 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.