Recently the phenomenon of high school students playing theaters and its corresponding impacts sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that students working of theaters can be a plus, and I will analyze over this essay.
From a social standpoint, very old written can be provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both international students and international colleges apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena and theater written plying by students might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental of alternative lifestyles relate to this reality that the demerits of destructive problems pertain to distinctive basis. As a tangible some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with unforeseen events. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of modern education.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I believe that the benefits of problematic issues of studying theater course far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only to do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove to significance of traditional subjects.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 266, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
... problems pertain to distinctive basis. As a tangible some scientific research und...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1425.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.7 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.20172203665 2.71678728327 118% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.3596447461 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.75 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.144289341943 0.242375264174 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0442288357423 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0409819028719 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0744750143146 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0343807409966 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.26 53.1260098522 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.5 10.9458128079 123% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 100.0 55.0591133005 182% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.