the Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Recently the phenomenon of changing information revolution and it's corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that massing communications between people can be a plus, and I will analyze all over this essay.
From a social standpoint, some effective on individual lives can be provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues as well as ultimate outcomes are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both international aims and classified data apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of public arena positively effects on society might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, fundamental aspects of alternative lifestyles relate to this reality that the demerits of distinctive basis pertain to unforeseen events. As a tangible some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of create processes with apparently of negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of... .
To conclude, while there are several compelling debates on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of changeable the way of communications far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only to do this unique phenomenon prove to significance of information of internet.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 94, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ution and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contes...
^^
Line 3, column 262, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “As” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ive basis pertain to unforeseen events. As a tangible some scientific research und...
^^
Line 3, column 501, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...to presume the preconceived notion of... . To conclude, while there are several c...
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1413.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69758064516 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.27163098428 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 170.0 139.433497537 122% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685483870968 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 464.4 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.8009227452 50.4703680194 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.75 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.5 7.25397266985 76% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.189360009484 0.242375264174 78% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0512708476968 0.0925447433944 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0487217559443 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0939538113204 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0168203155356 0.0609392437508 28% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.78 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.06 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 101.0 55.0591133005 183% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.