give an example of an accomplished person whose success didn't have any effect on his bad neighborhood.
many people think that regions affect a successful person. what is your opinion about the native region and accomplished person influence on the region he belongs to?
Recently, the phenomenon of an accomplishing person and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many native environments that are highly beneficial underprivileged region, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that utopia can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From being diligent standpoint, consistent can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the family structure, as well as a gifted person, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student I performed an academic research which deciphered being self-motivated. Thus, the fundamental ramifications of both innate talent and internal talent can be seen.
Within the realm of impressive accomplishment, hard-working might increase the consequences of personal growth. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of phenomenal success relate to this reality that the demerits of failing miserably pertain to the underprivileged regions. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertook by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of bringing out the best correlated negatively with the crowning achievement. Hence. it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of a residential neighborhood.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the successful person far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of native regions prove the significance of making the breakthrough, but also pinpoint of native environment implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 463, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...gatively with the crowning achievement. Hence. it is correct to presume the preconcei...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 470, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...y with the crowning achievement. Hence. it is correct to presume the preconceived ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1469.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 253.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.80632411067 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98822939669 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.47906925568 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.664031620553 0.580463131201 114% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.3762086029 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.416666667 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0833333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.41666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.197610484999 0.242375264174 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0585287995314 0.0925447433944 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0501929371432 0.071462118173 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108662277568 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.046514404961 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.42 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.17 8.32886699507 134% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.