The government should create a better network of public transport available for everyone or build more roads owning population.
It is increasingly acknowledged that the traffic problem is one of the biggest issues that the government is facing nowadays. While some people believe that building more roads will be the solution, others advocate public transport is what the government should promote. As far as I am concerned, creating a better network of public transport will be more beneficial in respect of this issue.
People who emphasize the importance of more freeways in cities are primarily focusing on decreasing the congestion in urban areas. Nevertheless, this argument cannot hold water. This is because most people work in a suburb close to where they live. Hence, congestion is a problem in downtowns instead of rural areas where freeways may play a role.
It is evidently reasonable for me to believe that public transport has more benefits. Firstly, it reduces pollution and road congestion. The more people who travel by train, tram or bus, the fewer cars we will have on the road. In addition, it also requires less land use than road infrastructure. Moreover, commuting by public transport also helps foster a sense of community. For instance, people traveling together are more likely to feel a community connection than those traveling in cars in isolation. This is to say, public transport provides accessible transport for people regardless of demographics such as income or age.
In a nutshell, while this controversial topic never fails to attract the public attention, we can safely reach the conclusion that there is a need for governments to put money in developing public transport networks instead of building more roads.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, hence, may, moreover, nevertheless, so, while, for instance, in addition, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21673003802 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.90009150357 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585551330798 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 424.8 379.143842365 112% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 47.7346368537 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 91.4666666667 104.977214359 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.86666666667 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.348333448431 0.242375264174 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10388173451 0.0925447433944 112% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0932493265239 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204827815326 0.151781067708 135% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.115642446937 0.0609392437508 190% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 12.6369458128 94% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.7 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.8 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.