For governments and organizations, what is a critical global problem and what is the
solution?
Recently, the phenomenon of critical global problems and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of climate change is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that global communities can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, important global solutions can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of local governments, as well as social co-operation, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered modern consumption patterns. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both innovative ideas and international companies apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, international concerns might increase the consequences of deforestation. Moreover, fundamental aspects of high fossil-fuel consumption would relate to this reality that the demerits of un-renewable energy pertain to natural resources. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of governmental services is correlated negatively with international organizations. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of solving important problems.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of governmental solution methods far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of a clean environment prove the significance of globalization, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1501.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95634920635 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.4925391992 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.68253968254 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7462636444 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.083333333 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0670970608444 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226615494771 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0443559660119 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0359717791434 0.151781067708 24% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0393081981147 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.45 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.