How do you think the crime would reduce with harsher punishments or moral teachings? Discuss both the views and take a stand.
The substantial influence of criminal activities has sparked the controversy over recent years. These days, there is an ongoing debate between people about misbehavior of people will be reduced with help of hard punishments or ethical training. This essay will discuss on both sides of the arguments and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriads of reason why extreme punishments will reduce misconduct, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that people will be afraid of committing crimes. Actually, visualizing the hard punishments will let them double think before perform any criminal activity. As an illustration, severe punishment of hangman will create fear among the other people and helps to bring down of misbehavior. Eventually, criminal activities will come down by implementing severe punishments.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and tend to believe moral teaching also significant factor to reduce the crime rate, but the most predominant one lies in the fact that awareness among people are vital. Furthermore, without doubts proper guidelines with mentoring the people will create self-realization to avoid law-breaking. For instance, social service camps will create awareness on various impacts and consequences of criminal activities. Because of this, ethical teaching will reduce crime in the environment.
In summary, the foregoing discussion propounds the view that ease of crime activities can be achieve with help of hard penalties or by creating social awareness. In my opinion, I would strongly recommend that more severe the punishment will definitely better option in terms of all aspect of moderate the lawbreaking and will keep society more livable place.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, furthermore, if, nevertheless, so, thus, for instance, in summary, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 6.10837438424 246% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1488.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55223880597 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.96181234517 2.71678728327 109% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.611940298507 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.229899657 50.4703680194 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.461538462 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.25397266985 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.167082490557 0.242375264174 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0621728585285 0.0925447433944 67% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0493715256938 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107668111736 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270092122179 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.91 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.46 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.