How widely of you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?

With the demand of increase workload at workplaces it is often noticed that people spend extra time on work premises than compared to time spend with family. This phenomenon is causing a huge trouble and people are loosing the real aesthetics of the quality time spend with family.

People are now-a-days becoming workaholics sometimes it is the requirement of the situation and sometimes it is personal preferences of the individual's. Working for a long hour has become a daunting factor in the race of humanity. I would like to explain the above point in this regard, it is highly required that people should maintain a good work-life balance because when we work more we often feel exhausted and tired. This entire situation of feeling drained can be controlled by keeping a good balance between work pressure and personal life. Time spend with family and friends are the best recreational activity and could motivate you to perform better and handle day to day challenges in a virtuous way.

Personal life is eventually which matters more and work is just a process of attaining money. We need to categorize our priorities and requirements in term of personal and professional life. Maintaining both the aspect is absolutely vital and is an act of proper equilibrium process when we lean towards any of these aspect more we might lose the true value of our life.

In conclusion, it is absolutely mandatory to keep our priorities set and personalize your preferences by keeping the true value of working in an organization and spending some quality time with family and friends.

Votes
Average: 8 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 216, Rule ID: LOOSING_EFFORTRECORDSEASON[1]
Message: Did you mean 'losing the'?
Suggestion: losing the
...s causing a huge trouble and people are loosing the real aesthetics of the quality time spe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 694, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a virtuous way" with adverb for "virtuous"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...better and handle day to day challenges in a virtuous way. Personal life is eventually which m...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 312, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this aspect' or 'these aspects'?
Suggestion: this aspect; these aspects
...ium process when we lean towards any of these aspect more we might lose the true value of ou...
^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, in conclusion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 8.36945812808 167% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1326.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.00377358491 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78848264428 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547169811321 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4780635043 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.545454545 104.977214359 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.0909090909 20.9669160288 115% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.90909090909 7.25397266985 26% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.229213332196 0.242375264174 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0898742638253 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0510483025615 0.071462118173 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.139058570862 0.151781067708 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0555573159044 0.0609392437508 91% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.02 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.