I t is important for children to study a film at school to learn literature.
In this day and age, the phenomenon of the essential studying and its corresponding effect has sparked heated controversy. Although contested by many the matter of vital educational methods is highly profitable, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a considerable number of individuals. I am inclined to conceive that well-informed children can be a good point, and I will analyze it throughout this essay.
Initially, from a social viewpoint, children's education can supply the society with some conspicuous impacts which are rooted in the fact that e-education, as well as modern methods, are integrally bound up. According to my own experience when I was a university student, I carried out an academic experiment that detected none effective teaching. Thus, beneficial ramifications of literature sources and being cost-effective apparently can be seen.
Secondly, within the realm of science, literature educational films might escalate the consequences of learning literature efficiently. Furthermore, the fundamental facets of traditional means could correlate with this reality that the demerits of time-consuming education are associated with costly schooling. To shed light on this point, some scientific research undertaken by an elite university has asserted that the downside of frustrated students is negatively related to being sophisticated. Hence, it is true to assume the preconceived notion of mundane courses.
To make a long story short, while there are several arguments on both sides, I deeply believe that the benefits of the learning literature outnumber its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of educational amenities prove the magnitude of professional schools, but also pinpoint responsible teacher implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, furthermore, hence, if, second, secondly, so, thus, well, while, as well as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1518.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77186311787 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.35789023839 2.71678728327 124% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.680608365019 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9389657741 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.5 104.977214359 121% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.067995753157 0.242375264174 28% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0226341777339 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300586831498 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0375640213354 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0113267176124 0.0609392437508 19% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 53.1260098522 47% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.86 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.5 9.94827586207 156% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.