With the increase of digital media avaialble online, the role of the library has becoem obsolete. universities should only procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
The topic of digital libraries has become a heated debate among academics. Although many people assert that universities should produce digital media instead of updating textbooks, others refute this proposition saying that this will only aggravate the situation. This essay will discuss the advantages and disadvantages of online libraries and reach a logical conclusion.
On the one hand, there are many benefits linked with the digital libraries in which the most preponderant one is that students can connect and interact with worldwide libraries for their assignments and thesis. Furthermore, digital media will enhance their communication skills and excel their knowledge by providing millions of resources online for research. For instance, a study revealed that about 80% of students in the world are getting benefit from digital media around the globe. Hence, this why online media is helpful for youth.
On the other hand, there are negative implications attached to a proposal in which the most appearing one could be that traditional book reading will be obsolete. Moreover, the study stuff or material which is not online yet will be disappear from the libraries and students will never get to know about it. For example, a survey estimated that about 50% of traditional books will be destroyed because of negligence. Apparently, digital libraries also have many disadvantages.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the benefits and pitfalls of digital media in the modern era. Therefore, in my opinion, its potential benefits outweigh its negative advantages and can be ignored at a substantial cost.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, furthermore, hence, moreover, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1372.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46613545817 5.00649968141 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84463267376 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561752988048 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 431.1 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.8667996879 50.4703680194 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.538461538 104.977214359 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.3076923077 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.5384615385 7.25397266985 145% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.26402959277 0.242375264174 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103129910138 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0744000366709 0.071462118173 104% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.171260347387 0.151781067708 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0986051870675 0.0609392437508 162% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 12.6369458128 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.45 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.