With the increase of digital media available online, the role of the library has become obsolete. Universities should only
procure digital media rather than constantly updating textbooks. Discuss both the advantages and disadvantages of this position and give your own point of view.
In contemporary era, the human society forging ahead with an amazing rate in various realms. Yet, at the same time, the grave issue that library forces the challenge in the light of the digital media has triggered intensive controversy. In the essay, we will discuss the benefits and drawbacks between them.
Undeniably, there is a widely believe that digital media give the latest information about the particular topic with many other options, compare with library. Furthermore, the limit of space and time is broken by digital media which is available in 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Nevertheless, it should recognize that watching screen for a long time is harmful to physical and psychological health. In addition, the effective media makes student’s work easier than before since information is convenient to get online, inducing students copy other’s assignments effortless.
From my view, the traditional library strength on substantial collections is not obviously with new media development. However, it is admittedly that libraries provide a free place to education, which is hard to make by digital media in poor countries and remote areas. Thus, to coöperate between libraries and new media is a win-win strategy. it is likely not only to improving the communication with readers effectively but also to solving the problem on materials and resources’ conservation.
To summarize, from what has been discussed, libraries and digital media play an essential role in people’s life, their mutual integration can contribute to universities education in a more effective way.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...other's assignments effortless. From my view, the traditional library st...
^^^^^
Line 9, column 345, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: It
...es and new media is a win-win strategy. it is likely not only to improving the com...
^^
Line 11, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls and resources' conservation. To summarize, from what has been discuss...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1382.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.528 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1564131542 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 433.8 379.143842365 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2995726473 50.4703680194 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.166666667 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8333333333 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.25397266985 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.285584653822 0.242375264174 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0908431432193 0.0925447433944 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0484728474449 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158874276715 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0237033883459 0.0609392437508 39% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 12.6369458128 119% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.81 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 55.0591133005 149% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.