Information revolution has changed the way of mass communications and had some negative and positive effects on individual lives as well as on society. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
In these days, people often take a variety of viewpoints when it comes to most daily life issues. To give an illustration, while many people believe that the information advancement has changed the way of mass communications and affect individual as well as the society, other holds the opinion that this is not the case. This essay offers some insights in favor of the former outlook.
There are numerous reliable grounds to support the belief that the information revolution has altered the way of mass communications. First and foremost, it is easy to gain access to a huge source of data online with just a few clicks thanks to the advent of the internet and computers. This is true especially for the online newspaper, which provides people with the latest updates instantaneously regarding various topic such as sport, economy and society. Such striking features, however, were not available in the traditional newspaper. Without information revolution, it can be argued that the mass communications would not advance this far and people may not be informed about the world around them.
In addition, ample evidence from a number of studies also supports that the advancement of information has changed the way people communicate. There is no doubt that people can keep in touch with one another regardless of their physical location and distance thanks to the advent of the internet and computers. This is much better as compared to sending letters as in the old days, which takes a great deal of time and is neither reliable nor efficient. To give an illustration, online social network such as Facebook and Yahoo have succeed in connecting thousands of people around the globe, bringing about a lot of positive impact to the individual as well as society.
In conclusion, from the above analysis, it is obvious that the information revolution has resulted in changes in mass communications, which leads to positive impact to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 534, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'succeeded'.
Suggestion: succeeded
...network such as Facebook and Yahoo have succeed in connecting thousands of people aroun...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, if, look, may, regarding, so, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, no doubt, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 31.9359605911 147% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 5.75862068966 295% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 321.0 242.827586207 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09968847352 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89751781956 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.532710280374 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 513.9 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 45.6097415111 50.4703680194 90% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.923076923 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.6923076923 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.38461538462 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209286355236 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0727384631727 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0780273820134 0.071462118173 109% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.145098549943 0.151781067708 96% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0412348243824 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 12.6369458128 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.6 11.5310837438 109% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 55.0591133005 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.