It has recently been suggested that classic or dead languages, Latin and Greek should be re-introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job. Those in favour of the idea say that education is more about training the mind than preparing for a career. Which of these points of view do you most agree with? Support your argument, where possible, with reasons and/ or examples from your experience and observations.
Irrefutable, the topic of introducing classical languages like Latin and Greek has become a heated debate among societies. Although many people assert that these languages will not help people with certain achievements, the others refute this proposal saying that these are very beneficial for human beings. This essay will discuss how ancient languages can fortify our lives and reach a logical conclusion.
There are many aspects which find out why old languages should be taught in the schools in which the most preponderant one is that these languages will open new avenues towards getting knowledge about traditional cultures. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that these will help to know the orthodox norms which have been vanished. For instance, in a recent study, it is proved that students who study old languages at schools know more about history. Consequently, dead languages play a pivotal role as for as learning of traditional values is concerned.
Another major contributing factor would be that these languages will enhance brain abilities of children by excel their confidence, Moreover, they will do better in their studies which lead them to a better future career. For example, in a recent survey, it is revealed that about 70% of successful people are those who know more than one language. Apparently, the bilingual ability is a precursor for getting a good job.
In conclusion, this essay discussed the advantages of mastering old languages in terms of getting a better job as well as nourishing children mind. Therefore, in my opinion, these languages should be supported at all levels of government.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
apparently, but, consequently, furthermore, if, moreover, so, therefore, well, as for, for example, for instance, in conclusion, as well as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 5.94088669951 219% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1374.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 260.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 5.28461538462 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80257700515 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607692307692 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 421.2 379.143842365 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7336359395 50.4703680194 95% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.5 104.977214359 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6666666667 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8333333333 7.25397266985 177% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18416471973 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.069560704397 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0288850022668 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109061862976 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0163057103875 0.0609392437508 27% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 12.6369458128 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.34 11.5310837438 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.23 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.