It is more important for students to study history and literature that it is for them to study science and mathematics use specific reasons and example to support.
The importance of the it is more important for students to study history and literature than it is for them to study science and mathematics use, which has always been debatable has now upsurged a lots of instruments in favor and against it, thus it has became even more controversial. The substantial influence of imitating celebrities has sparked controversial over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the society in recent years. It can be agreed that the upside of imitating celebrities are instruments indeed, however it has some various drawbacks as well. This essay will be elaborate on both assertions and provide well-weighted conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why the more importance for students to study history and literature is unreservedly salient, but the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that that study bright the future the young students. Therefore, it is vital time to appreciate both the significance of the importance for students to study history foe the overall amelioration of society.
However, it has some people who choose to think differently and hold an opposing viewpoint, which can certainly overwhelm substantial influence on the more importance for students to study history and literature? Nevertheless, the contradiction is rooted in the fact that disadvantage. Hence, it is apparent that the downside of the study cannot be overlooked.
The above presented dissertation illustrates both perspectives about the impact of the most important for students to study history and literature. While it is evident it has various benefits, although its deleterious effect cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 19, Rule ID: DT_PRP[1]
Message: Possible typo. Did you mean 'the' or 'it'?
Suggestion: the; it
The importance of the it is more important for students to study...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 196, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[1]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'a lot' or simply 'lots'?
Suggestion: a lot; lots
... always been debatable has now upsurged a lots of instruments in favor and against it,...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 255, Rule ID: HAVE_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Use past participle here: 'become'.
Suggestion: become
...ts in favor and against it, thus it has became even more controversial. The substantia...
^^^^^^
Line 1, column 386, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...ked controversial over the potential of this trends is an integral part of the socie...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, well, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 262.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37404580153 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02323427807 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.15246843327 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.530534351145 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.0 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.7724642609 50.4703680194 132% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.0 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.8181818182 20.9669160288 114% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.25397266985 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.478875011308 0.242375264174 198% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.157618993032 0.0925447433944 170% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.172123396827 0.071462118173 241% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.287943125892 0.151781067708 190% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0817799608023 0.0609392437508 134% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.94 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.