Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion on this? Do you think this is a good or bad change?
The effect of replacing small stores for larger ones, which was always debatable, has now become more controversial. The substantial influence of closing a mall because of its size has sparked the controversy over the potential impact of this trend on local business in recent years. It can be agreed that larger shopping malls contribute on more relevant opportunities, but some people claim that this statement has some drawbacks as well. This essay will elaborate on how the replacement of a building can bring prosperity to a region and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why larger shopping malls are better for the city but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that these changes may bring more investment to the area to be accessed. For instance, huge shops can support more number of stores, consequently, it will perform more brands, generate more jobs and expand the flow of people playing a vital role in the community.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that changing a place may result in a more attractive place for foreign business and make viable economic funds to the local economy. In addition, successful business can perform better services for society and advances in technology to open a wild range of opportunities for new ideas and products.
From what has been discussed above, it can be concluded that building a place with larger capacity may be hard in the first moment, but it brings numerous benefits for the community, hence the way it is done should be well handled.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, first, hence, if, may, so, thus, well, for instance, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1320.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98113207547 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.72785037627 2.71678728327 100% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.596226415094 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 413.1 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 29.0 20.5024630542 141% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 33.7960476906 50.4703680194 67% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.666666667 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.4444444444 20.9669160288 140% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.22222222222 7.25397266985 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.135803197152 0.242375264174 56% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0611429800677 0.0925447433944 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368451110162 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0769742193422 0.151781067708 51% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600887095033 0.0609392437508 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 53.1260098522 79% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.2 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.54 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 55.0591133005 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.3980295567 131% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.