law can change human behaviour. do you agree or not?
Nowadays, the most important issue in the 21st century is the human behaviour in the societies. Many believe that law can change the human manners, while opponents have a diverse view and believe that other factors such as personality and education play pivotal roles in reducing crime,
To begin with, there are several reasons that I believe law play an important role to prevent people of doing criminal activities. First and foremost is that there should be an efficient instruments to protect individuals' right against offenders. In addition, there is a little room doubt that some restrict legislations such as death penalty and life imprisonment could pave the ways of threatening more lawbreakers. For example, a group of profound researchers, working in a prestigious university conducted a survey between two countries, in order to determine the relationship between more severe laws and crime rates. Therefore, the result was statistically significance and revealed that the more efficient law, the less crimes nations will face in their societies.
On the other hand, many socialist argued that there are other factors that should be taken into consideration to reduce crime rates such as personalities, the way of upbringing children. That is to say, law lonely will not be successful if there were not the productive educational ministry to educate youngest to show good behaviour in their societies.
To recapitulate, although there are many reasons to support both perspectives, my personal sentiment is that the authorities should legislate more severe law to control lawbreakers and prevent to see a firs-time offender.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 723, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun crimes is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...vealed that the more efficient law, the less crimes nations will face in their socie...
^^^^
Line 5, column 20, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun socialist seems to be countable; consider using: 'many socialists'.
Suggestion: many socialists
... their societies. On the other hand, many socialist argued that there are other factors tha...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, so, therefore, while, for example, in addition, such as, to begin with, on the other hand, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1390.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40856031128 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0144569324 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603112840467 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 437.4 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 28.0 20.5024630542 137% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 63.0608172058 50.4703680194 125% => OK
Chars per sentence: 154.444444444 104.977214359 147% => OK
Words per sentence: 28.5555555556 20.9669160288 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 12.8888888889 7.25397266985 178% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.171070915197 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.059940762135 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0627322347382 0.071462118173 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.100628609424 0.151781067708 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0748003446541 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.3 12.6369458128 145% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 34.6 53.1260098522 65% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 10.9458128079 141% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.39 11.5310837438 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 78.0 55.0591133005 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.2 10.3980295567 127% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.