Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. It is more positive for their future prospects, though it can also have some adverse effects. Do you agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. It is more positive for their future prospects, though it can also have some adverse effects. Do you agree or disagree?

Although such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive dialogue on whether it is helpful for children to learn a new language or not can lead to thought-provoking discussions. I have a mixed opinion about the topic because there are positives and negatives of learning a new dialect for children.

there are a number of reasons in favour of my stance. Firstly, creativity is easily developed in children when they learn a new language. As they learn to speak in a new dialect, it enhances their analytical ability. For instance, a recently completed survey has confirmed that children who learn new languages are more versatile and quick-learners in schools. Therefore, it exemplifies the fact that learning a new language is beneficial for students.

On the other hand, learning a new language is a waste of children's time and energy as they have many important and interesting things to learn in their lives. For instance, they can learn to play musical instruments such as a guitar or a piano, or they can learn a new sport such as swimming or cricket to become a future sportsperson. Thus, learning a new language is undermining the potential in children.

To conclude, I see that there is equally potential evidence to support the arguments that I have provided, and hence I agree that learning a new language has its own set of advantages and disadvantages for children.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 42, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[10]
Message: The adverb 'never' is usually put between 'will' and 'yield'.
Suggestion: will never yield
...lthough such topics, in all likelihood, never will yield a consensual agreement, a constructive ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: There
...learning a new dialect for children. there are a number of reasons in favour of my...
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, hence, if, so, therefore, thus, for instance, such as, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 238.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01680672269 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92775363542 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.11636703887 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 124.0 139.433497537 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.521008403361 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 371.7 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 55.3913201423 50.4703680194 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.545454545 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6363636364 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.0 7.25397266985 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.363763863757 0.242375264174 150% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.155442865807 0.0925447433944 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610235927798 0.071462118173 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.240680573722 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0267133157215 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 12.6369458128 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.73 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.