Learning a new language at an early age is helpful for children. Is it more positive for their future aspect or have some adverse effects? Agree or disagree?
Studying a new language in early ages has become a controversial issue among the public all around the world. Although it is regarded by a considerable number of peoples as thoroughly both constructive and positive, others hold opponents' view. I am inclined to profoundly believe that this subject is entirely beneficial as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
There are several reasons why being familiar with a new language specifically in primary schools is advantageous. First and foremost, an array of families argued that this ability plays a pivotal role in the youngsters' lives. For instance, if they know several languages, they will enhance their communicating skills and it is quite useful for achieving a prosperous future. But the point is, it attains in early ages easier than they become older because in these ages the brain has more power and the process of learning and instructing do easier and faster. Furthermore, the youths do not involve various circumstances and they are never under such stress that adults have. Therefore, studying can be done by them without any tough difficulty.
On the one hand, there is no doubt learning in early ages can provide the young generation with various negative points. No sooner they had faced foreign words than they comprehended that it might be useless. Namely, not only it might create negative feelings about other languages in themselves but also it could affect their education and other subjects in their curriculum. As per to recent research conducted by Tehran University, the negative feeling which appeared at early ages are completely strong and a plethora of energies should be spent to alter them.
In conclusion, while this capability has some demerits, I strongly believe that its benefits outweigh its demerits.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, furthermore, if, so, therefore, while, for instance, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 292.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23287671233 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13376432452 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79677756022 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 189.0 139.433497537 136% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.647260273973 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.8850812897 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 109.142857143 104.977214359 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.8571428571 20.9669160288 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.71428571429 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216451372078 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0593096366961 0.0925447433944 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044178334068 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.107167338465 0.151781067708 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0514231086842 0.0609392437508 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.