Logging of the rain forests is a serious problem and it may have devastating effects on animals and human life discuss?
The implication of logging of the rain forests is a serious problem may have devastating effects on animals and human life. Which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous areas. The sizeable influence of this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this tread. I believe that I am agreeing with this topic and this will be further discussed before reading a logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that because it is a main reason of global warming and environment is imbalanced and this can be contributing factor to harmful for those animals which lived in forests for instance research invariable shows that the damaging of forests. Therefore, the negative impact of rain forests is a main reason of losing animals which is lived in forests. Cutting forests is the main problem of global warming and it is pollution the environment and the ecological system is also imbalanced cannot be denied.
The importance of rain forests is a serious problem it may have devastating effects on animals and human life can be debated but the facts remains that there were several factors to this them and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that rain forests is a harmful for animals and humans it can be predicted that in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 125, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Which” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ting effects on animals and human life. Which is fairly debatable has now gained furt...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 328, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
... impact of this tread. I believe that I am agreeing with this topic and this will be furthe...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, may, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 26.0 31.9359605911 81% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1194.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 240.0 242.827586207 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.975 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.93597934253 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67331203233 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 122.0 139.433497537 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.508333333333 0.580463131201 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 378.0 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 12.6551724138 71% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.1395981257 50.4703680194 163% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.666666667 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.6666666667 20.9669160288 127% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.385947282678 0.242375264174 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.196907972783 0.0925447433944 213% => Sentence topic similarity is high.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.272507019353 0.071462118173 381% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.27973622073 0.151781067708 184% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.124295550091 0.0609392437508 204% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.09 53.1260098522 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.84 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.14 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.