machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people
The discussion on machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation ands there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their argument. The subject attract majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay i shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant examples and explantion before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that now day many machine is increasing day by day which is more fine because there are many type of advantages new machine. Another pivotal aspect of this arguments is that 2018 in 80% people depend on new technology machine because machine with time save. Needless to say, all these merits stand is a good stead.
However, there are soem pitfalls that negate these arguments anbd which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that in these days machine is increased but any people do not like new machine. Besides, for example car or bike 80% accident creats with new machine which is more bad. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of machine are instrmantal indeed. Nevertheless, its
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... among people of concern. In this essay i shall scrutinize both points of view by...
^
Line 7, column 133, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun machine seems to be countable; consider using: 'many machines'.
Suggestion: many machines
...nt one stems from the fact that now day many machine is increasing day by day which is more ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 208, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...ay which is more fine because there are many type of advantages new machine. Another pivo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 271, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... new machine. Another pivotal aspect of this arguments is that 2018 in 80% people de...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, nevertheless, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1240.0 1207.87684729 103% => OK
No of words: 247.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.02024291498 5.00649968141 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96437052324 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63806115373 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587044534413 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 393.3 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 80.9827039997 50.4703680194 160% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.0 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.7 20.9669160288 118% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.3919200237 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.12549721879 0.0925447433944 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.202771827409 0.071462118173 284% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.210607451205 0.151781067708 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.188742457019 0.0609392437508 310% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.13 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.28 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.