machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation and there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people
The discussion on machine interpretation is slower and less exact than human interpretation ands there is on prompt or probability of machine assuming control over this part from people is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their argument. The subject attract majority of view from people and remain a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay i shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant examples and explantion before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact th because there are many type of advantages new machine. Another pivotal aspect of this arguments is that people depend on new technology machine because machine with time save. Needless to say, all these merits stand is a good stead.
However, there are soem pitfalls that negate these arguments anbd which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that. Besides, for example car or bike accident creats with new machine which is more bad. Hence, it is apparent why many are against this trend.
According to the aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of machine are instrmantal indeed. Nevertheless, its
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 378, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
... among people of concern. In this essay i shall scrutinize both points of view by...
^
Line 7, column 141, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun type seems to be countable; consider using: 'many types'.
Suggestion: many types
...tems from the fact th because there are many type of advantages new machine. Another pivo...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 204, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
... new machine. Another pivotal aspect of this arguments is that people depend on new ...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, nevertheless, so, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1114.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 216.0 242.827586207 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15740740741 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.83365862548 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68588352988 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62962962963 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.2447253475 50.4703680194 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.4 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.6 20.9669160288 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.9 7.25397266985 81% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.403779517611 0.242375264174 167% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119120261935 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.205518055199 0.071462118173 288% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.200105690997 0.151781067708 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.194940412942 0.0609392437508 320% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.48 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 52.0 55.0591133005 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.