Because of the global economy, many goods including what we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance. To what extent do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages?
The implication of we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance, which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence for this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I believe that this is very good idea and this will be further discussed before reaching logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reasons why this subject has considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that I am agree for this topic and this can be contributing factor to this is absolutely good idea for instance, a research invariably show that the countries have to be transported for a long distance is good. Therefore, the negative impact of that this cannot be denied.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and trend to believe that this topic is not good and can be addressed with some position as well as there are innumerable facts in favor of that, but the most pre-dominant one stems from the fact that I am disagree for this topic. As an illustration, findings of some studies reveal that this is not good idea. Hence, the importance of this is undeniable.
The importance of we use daily produced by other countries have to be transported for a long distance can be debated. But the fact remains that there were several factors lead to this theme and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that this topic is maybe good or bad.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 143, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...cuous one stems from the fact that I am agree for this topic and this can be contribu...
^^^^^
Line 5, column 256, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[1]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'disagreed'.
Suggestion: disagreed
...inant one stems from the fact that I am disagree for this topic. As an illustration, fin...
^^^^^^^^
Line 9, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...hat this topic is maybe good or bad.
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, may, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 10.5418719212 190% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 20.9802955665 148% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1270.0 1207.87684729 105% => OK
No of words: 261.0 242.827586207 107% => OK
Chars per words: 4.86590038314 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7336567344 2.71678728327 101% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.505747126437 0.580463131201 87% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 89.7114750761 50.4703680194 178% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.454545455 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.7272727273 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.90909090909 7.25397266985 95% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215914539509 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102411802434 0.0925447433944 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.127131197749 0.071462118173 178% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167730722775 0.151781067708 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0788925694737 0.0609392437508 129% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.26 11.5310837438 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.47 8.32886699507 102% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.