The majority of television news being reported is bad news: wars, famines, accidents and crime. Some people think that television news should be a mixture of good and bad news.
In this modern era, there is an ongoing deliberation among people about the positive and negative effects on the society due to publishing bad news on television. While it is possible to claim that telecasting bad news has more advantages, my point of view that the advantages of reporting a mixture of good and bad new outweigh the disadvantages. In this essay, I shall explain my point of view while analysing both sides of the argument.
Frist and foremost, there are myriad of advantages a community can gain because of reporting a mixture of good and bad news. For example, the Channel CNN has been broadcasting mixture of programs such as sports, science, accidents and crimes and politics. Therefore more television fans have been attracted by CNN while providing more integrity and confidentiality. Therefore, it is believed that television news should consist of a mixture of programs.
On the other hand, those who believed the bad news as the best has a different point of view and say, to get more attraction in this competitive market, channels should broadcast and telecast bad news such as crimes and war. For instance, most of the Sri Lankan newspapers and websites publish more violent news for there content readers. Therefore, it is taken in to account that more violent news is a must in this competitive market. But, most of the channels do not have a long strong future with long-term availability.
In conclusion, it is strongly believed that a quality television channel should telecast mixture of news. In nutshell, it is taken in to account that the government and the professional’s interference is essential for a sustainable control of telecasting news with relevant rules and regulations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 257, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
...nce, accidents and crimes and politics. Therefore more television fans have been attracte...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1451.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 284.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.10915492958 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10515524023 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06960473345 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.5 0.580463131201 86% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 450.9 379.143842365 119% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.5669925544 50.4703680194 86% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.615384615 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.8461538462 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.61538461538 7.25397266985 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.381884178878 0.242375264174 158% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146856136694 0.0925447433944 159% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.10502202931 0.071462118173 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.24110487131 0.151781067708 159% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0375488919454 0.0609392437508 62% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.68 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.