Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of company. Do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of employee's involvement in decision making and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that work environment is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that job satisfaction can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the enterpriser's standpoint, organization chart can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that company policy, as well as better progression, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered well-established companies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both motivation and participation apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of vocational training, organization behavior might increase the consequences of highly-skilled worker. Moreover, fundamental aspect of human resource related to this reality that the demerits of providing valuable information pertain to a company management. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of employee's engagement is correlated negatively with social security. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of social endorsement.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of evaluation far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of hierarchy prove the significance of running company, but also pinpoint white collar job implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 10, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'enterprisers'' or 'enterpriser's'?
Suggestion: enterprisers'; enterpriser's
...that throughout this essay. From the enterprisers standpoint, organization chart can prov...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 31.9359605911 94% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1460.0 1207.87684729 121% => OK
No of words: 245.0 242.827586207 101% => OK
Chars per words: 5.95918367347 5.00649968141 119% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.95632099841 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.48855211156 2.71678728327 128% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.697959183673 0.580463131201 120% => OK
syllable_count: 467.1 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.57093596059 121% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.566515084 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.666666667 104.977214359 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4166666667 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.117367061674 0.242375264174 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0333868612254 0.0925447433944 36% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0466442487675 0.071462118173 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0583778635608 0.151781067708 38% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259669280896 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 25.8 53.1260098522 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.29 11.5310837438 150% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.33 8.32886699507 136% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.