Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
In this modern era, the influence of work environment on employees and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that to work along friendly colleagues can be highly beneficial to workers, such a critical phenomenon regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of experts in an array of fields. I am inclined to believe that friendly environment can be a plus and I will analyze that in this essay.
From a psychological standpoint, surrounding ourselves with cooperative employees can provide companies with some noticeable effects, which are rooted in the fact that multinational corporations, as well as some shareholders are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered balancing time at work and at home is a huge task for most professionals. Thus, beneficial ramifications of participating in decision making at work apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of sociology, the ambience of organizations might increase the consequences of being workaholic. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of team work relate to this reality that the demerits of spending long hours in work-related meetings pertain to health implications. As a tangible example, a recent scientific study undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of job-related issues is correlated negatively with jobs. Hence, it is logical to assume that the preconceived notion of getting promotion.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of working alongside friendly coworkers far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of socializing with employers prove the significance of workplaces, but also pinpoint considerable implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1600.0 1207.87684729 132% => OK
No of words: 282.0 242.827586207 116% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67375886525 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09790868904 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.44619555009 2.71678728327 127% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 139.433497537 132% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.652482269504 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 507.6 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3131595936 50.4703680194 104% => OK
Chars per sentence: 133.333333333 104.977214359 127% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.5 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0713013461982 0.242375264174 29% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0225211084098 0.0925447433944 24% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0290276405147 0.071462118173 41% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0374172551246 0.151781067708 25% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0373701451771 0.0609392437508 61% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.82 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 55.0591133005 196% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.