In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work.Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
In recent decades, a highly controversial issue has arisen regarding the involving children in the paid work in a number of countries. Some people are of the belief that being this is completely wrong while others believe that this engenders a work experience and learning to have responsibilities. I firmly concur with the opinion that paid works are beneficial for children because they increase their experience and become familiar with responsibilities.
To begin with, a job with salary has a significant impact on children because of experiences. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further acquiring knowledge and wisdom. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between knowing new materials and new technics even though new technologies and learning them should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between work experience and a positive effect on children.
Furthermore, children with having a job with a wage can learn to have more responsibilities. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne university concerning abdicating and having responsibilities. Indeed, if scientific research is significantly correlated with new tasks and owing new responsibilities, the preliminary findings will be closely allied with accepting a pressure and new roles. Hence, the likely outcomes would be significantly correlated with accepting new duties and be responsible for them.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that having a paid job has a positive influence on the children due to the acquiring knowledge and accepting responsibilities. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to find a job for their kids.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, while, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 20.9802955665 76% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1627.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70877192982 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.49194914532 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 515.7 379.143842365 136% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.4390885052 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.153846154 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9230769231 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.170963725667 0.242375264174 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0691212519842 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0756075416822 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119055388464 0.151781067708 78% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.114915782845 0.0609392437508 189% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.4 12.6369458128 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 11.5310837438 137% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.