In many parts of the world today there is a profitable market for the products which lighten or whiten people's skin outline the reasons for using such.
The implication of our skin, which is fairly debatable has now gained further attention from numerous arenas. The sizeable influence for this subject has generated controversy over the potential impact of this trend. I believe that this is good products for darks skin people and this will be further discussed before reaching logical conclusion.
At the outset, there are diverse reason, why this subject is considered as vital, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that some dark skin people using this products to fairly and this can be contributing factor to this is so good for instance, a research invariably show that. Therefore, the negative impact of cannot be denied.
Nevertheless, some people adopt an opposing view and trend to believe that the skin products is not good can be addressed with some position facets as well as there are innumerable facts in favor of that, but the most pre-dominant one stems from the fact that the skin products bad effect of our body. Which is not only this is not good, but also people use the products. As an illustration, finding some studies reveal that. Hence, importance of this is undeniable.
The importance of using products whiteness for our skin is debated. But the facts remain that there were several further lead to this theme and matter. Eventually, according to the above analysis, it can be concluded that the products is good or not good. It can be predicted that in the near future.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...e fact that some dark skin people using this products to fairly and this can be cont...
^^^^
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...n be predicted that in the near future.
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, nevertheless, so, therefore, well, for instance, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 10.5418719212 180% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1224.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 248.0 242.827586207 102% => OK
Chars per words: 4.93548387097 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.61133154145 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524193548387 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 372.6 379.143842365 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.931034482759 430% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 82.8246168706 50.4703680194 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 94.1538461538 104.977214359 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0769230769 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.176926781782 0.242375264174 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0697729675956 0.0925447433944 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0738066602233 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124848472515 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145072051177 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.37 11.5310837438 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.27 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 55.0591133005 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.