Many people think regions affect successful persons. What are your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to?
The substantial influences of native regions on the successful person have sparked a controversy amongst the public all around the globe. Although a specific arguments claimed that accomplishment is directly related to each individual's efforts, a group of intellectuals debate otherwise and hold an opponent's view. I am highly inclined to believe that the place we are living and studying highly effects our future prosperities. The agenda of this article is to discuss both sides of arguments and will lead to a legitimate conclusion.
At the outset, there are numerous reasons why location influences on child's achievements are supported, but the most remarkable one lies in the fact that a country and its education system directly correlated with shaping child's mind and success. Based on a recent longitudinal study, conducted by a group of profound social psychologists in a renowned university, 80% of our social behaviors policed by society's social cultures. Therefore, the location and the situation in terms of social, economic, and cultural has positively or negatively affected our future wealth.
Contrary to popular belief, there remain drawbacks clouded up the positive influences of location's marks on our fulfillment. The most alarming one is rooted in the fact that changing a living place might lead to more difficulties and lead to another barrier to achieving success. For instance, when I migrated to Australia, language and cultural difficulties put a ban on my prosperity in a host country. Therefore, the importance of cultural sustainability, social sustainability, welfare support, and immigrant public support must be taken highly into consideration by welfare officers.
To recapitulate, as we discussed earlier, there are several divergent opinions on both sides, my sentiment is that positive effects of native regions on individuals accomplishment take more credence that its drawbacks.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 159, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'argument'?
Suggestion: argument
...l around the globe. Although a specific arguments claimed that accomplishment is directly...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 154, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'individuals'' or 'individual's'?
Suggestion: individuals'; individual's
...t positive effects of native regions on individuals accomplishment take more credence that ...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, so, therefore, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1637.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58703071672 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22363214626 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 139.433497537 125% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.59385665529 0.580463131201 102% => OK
syllable_count: 522.9 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.4835978296 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.416666667 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.4166666667 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.0 7.25397266985 41% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131537169339 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0452759697279 0.0925447433944 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0722147884545 0.071462118173 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0854500872552 0.151781067708 56% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0564328845767 0.0609392437508 93% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.44 11.5310837438 134% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.32 8.32886699507 124% => OK
difficult_words: 102.0 55.0591133005 185% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.