Many people think regions affect successful persons. What is your opinion about native regions and accomplished person influence on the regions they belong to?
Recently, the phenomenon of regions affect successful persons and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures id highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that native regions and accomplished person influence the regions they belong to can be a plus, and I will discuss the controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the native regions can provide society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of critical issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered vocational education. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both complicated procedures and this common phenomenon apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, an accomplished person might increase the consequences of critical needs. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of the faulty system could relate to this reality that the demerits of too much hearing pertain to health problems. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with complex issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of the native regions far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint social implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-12-21 | gobindh Singh | 75 | view |
| 2019-12-13 | yasamin.gharib62 | 11 | view |
| 2019-12-05 | gobindh Singh | 77 | view |
| 2019-11-15 | maniram vicky | 65 | view |
- Personal development is the base for professional development and advancing in one’s career. To what extent do you agree or disagree? 77
- should government build more roads to allow more vehicle owner to improve the networks of public transport? 85
- If you are assigned to work on a study on climate change, what will you choose to focus on and why? 85
- Television has two roles: to inform and to entertain. Explain which of these roles you see as more important. To what extent do you think that TV today performs each of these roles in an effective way? Support your point of view with details from your own 80
- In a cashless society, people use more credit cards. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 88
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 175, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'procedures'' or 'procedure's'?
Suggestion: procedures'; procedure's
...sted by many that the matter of complex procedures id highly beneficial, such issue is reg...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1542.0 1207.87684729 128% => OK
No of words: 271.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.69003690037 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05734859645 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18469638911 2.71678728327 117% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638376383764 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 379.143842365 129% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3625421209 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.5 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5833333333 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.223068497088 0.242375264174 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.071702303457 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.104087097754 0.071462118173 146% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.12821432552 0.151781067708 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.123933451632 0.0609392437508 203% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.7 12.6369458128 132% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.79 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 104.0 55.0591133005 189% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.