One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is the colossal upsurge in the influence on the society by the mass media including TV, radio and newspaper. There is a widespread worry that some people believe they have the negative effect but the proponents are against it. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There are myriad of arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the positive vibes broadcasted by TV make us aware of the world in one go. In fact, not only do mass media helps in innovations but also bends the society towards development. We can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that invention in rural areas generates ideas watching TV programme. Needless to say, all these merits stand whole society in good stead, as far as the development is concerned.
On the other hand, one detrimental aspect of this argument is that mass media can turn the community into the war zone. Many communities declare war with their government after they know others doing same. For the salient example, there is a number of researches by various government bodies that show that in Gaza civil war influenced by the wrong news broadcasted and printed. People believe the media and make their opinion. Hence, it is apparent why many are against the false news mass media spread.
To recapitulate, in view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of TV and newspaper to shape the world are indeed too great to ignore.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, so, in fact, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 4.87169811321 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70290905084 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.577358490566 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 405.9 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.2372543659 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3076923077 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3846153846 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.84615384615 7.25397266985 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.215971391082 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0729441053332 0.0925447433944 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0669262724641 0.071462118173 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124852976866 0.151781067708 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0505479721098 0.0609392437508 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 12.6369458128 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.97 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.62 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.