The importance of the use of medical technology which was always debatable has now become an unprecedented controversy. The substantial influence of the medical technology has sparked controversy over the potential impact of this trend of increasing life expectancy due to the use of modern technology in recent years. Some people claim that men and women are living a healthy life because of it while others believe that due to the long longevity there is an extra burden on society. The following essay will delineate the positive and negative impact of the medical technology on the lifespan of people before deducing a logical conclusion.
At the very outset, there are numerous arguments in support of the usage of medical technology, but the most preponderant is that nowadays more men and women enjoy great health. To illustrate this point, various fatal diseases such as diabetes and asthma are now curable due to the advancement of medical technology and people are now living a healthy life. Moreover, deaths are concentrated in older age groups. Thus, medical technology plays a vital role in the increase in the average life of individuals.
On the other hand, the opponents of view stated above may defend that, improvement in public health and medical care facilities, countries are facing ageing population which consequently put an extra burden on the society. Although it is partially true that the long longevity is becoming a burden for the whole society but, it is almost impossible to say that senior citizens are not much beneficial for us.
Eventually, according to what has been discussed above, I strongly concede that despite some drawbacks, the benefits of the evolution of the medical technology which responsible for improved human's life cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 204, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... great health. To illustrate this point, various fatal diseases such as diabetes ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, if, may, moreover, so, thus, while, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1510.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 289.0 242.827586207 119% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22491349481 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.12310562562 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.83129571712 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 166.0 139.433497537 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574394463668 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 49.9851217533 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 137.272727273 104.977214359 131% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.2727272727 20.9669160288 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.36363636364 7.25397266985 102% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.256139874081 0.242375264174 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0992270764518 0.0925447433944 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0849481365208 0.071462118173 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.150085230808 0.151781067708 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0746292005106 0.0609392437508 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.3 12.6369458128 129% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.3 8.32886699507 112% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.