Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the responsibility of using technology in the health systems and its corrsponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although this issue is beneficial as it regarded by the substantial numbers of individuals both constructive and positive, others hold opponents views. I am inclined to believe that this technological features can be plus as it could develop brilliant aspects for its adherents.
From a social standpoint, utilizing modern and technological systems for exanine the patients and other parts of the lealth systems has several responsibilities. These benefits are rooted in the fact of development. From my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the effects of medical technology. Firstly, the modern equipment and utilizing the new and developed features for treating the diseases and diagnising them has diminished the rate of death. Doctors have this ability to consider an array of probabilities and all patient's conditions are under the control. Furthermore, the other paramount benefits of using technological health systems is the accurate reports of the patient's circumstances. Moreover, the ways of diagnosing and distingiush some diseases is relatively impossible without using the modern systems including cardiovascular diseases or the illness of the brain.
On the one hand, there is no doubt, the idea of the responsibility of using the technologocal systems for diagnosing the diseases and cure them has some opponents. They are argued that although thses features are benefite and facilitate the treatments, the doctors and other sophisticated people who are managing them are responsible for all errors or disfunctional problems.
In conclusion, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the creators and producers of these technological features are certainly responsible for inhabitants' life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, if, moreover, so, while, in conclusion, no doubt
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1678.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 293.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72696245734 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13729897018 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.33822244702 2.71678728327 123% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556313993174 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 531.0 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.1906280307 50.4703680194 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.076923077 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5384615385 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92307692308 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.134322962749 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.046835661774 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0404214086461 0.071462118173 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0940063841302 0.151781067708 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0294189622548 0.0609392437508 48% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.25 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 17.0 10.5123152709 162% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.