Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of advancement in medical tech and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that better health care could provide many beneficiaries, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by substantial numbers of individuals. I profoundly inclined to believe that medical improvement could be a plus for the human race, and this essay will examine this idea before concluding.
From the science standpoint, better treatment in medical care could bring many benefits for the society, which are rooted in the fact that proper medical attention and lifespan are extremely bound up. According to my own experience when I was a college student and I performed an academic survey about life expectancy, more than 80% of subjects tend to believe that physical well-being completely related to new advanced medical technology. Thus, the beneficial ramification of effective new medicine as well as broaden life hope apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of medical science, improvement in medical treatment could have some negative consequences on other parts of the body. Not to mention that the fundamental essence of complex technology could be inferred evidently from some unauthorized experiments on animals or even human. According to an academic survey conducted by a prestigious institute, 65% of new medicine need to be tested on live subjects before spreading legally. However, by providing better technological treatment and improving the human immune system, many unusual sicknesses could be cured.
To recapitulate, I pen down saying that although some opponents tend to believe that increasing life expectancy could bring some detrimental impacts such as rising longevity, I highly tend to think that better medical care not only could lead to professional lifestyle for every human-being but also could bring much positive life experience.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, however, if, so, thus, well, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1639.0 1207.87684729 136% => OK
No of words: 295.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.55593220339 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01830858726 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 139.433497537 128% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603389830508 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 529.2 379.143842365 140% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 64.4465311084 50.4703680194 128% => OK
Chars per sentence: 149.0 104.977214359 142% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.8181818182 20.9669160288 128% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.45454545455 7.25397266985 89% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.152586169234 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0604916777104 0.0925447433944 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0340967178022 0.071462118173 48% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0979320328712 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0149904763146 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 12.6369458128 144% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 28.17 53.1260098522 53% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.8 10.9458128079 144% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.26 11.5310837438 132% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.01 8.32886699507 120% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 55.0591133005 173% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.