Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Of late, there has been a colossal upsurge among the prodigies discussing the fact that advancements in medical technologies have improved humans’s life expectency. Critics, however claim that this improvement is the curse for society and mankind. I, personally believe that technological advancements are the blessing for society to increase life expectancy. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this statement before deducing any final conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad of arguments discussing the fact that how medical technology effects human health. Firstly, the most conspicuous one stem from the fact that in this contemporary world, introduction of latest medical procedures improve life expectancy of humans, which includes, laproscopic procedures, organ transplantation and introduction of most effective drugs. As a prime example, according to the recent research from the department of medical science, martality rates due to heart diseases have reduced to larger extent due to advancement in therapeutic procedures.
Another pivotal facet pertaining to this argument is that mother mortality rates have greatly been reduced due to innovative and effective medical procedures. Thus, this would lead to decrease infant mortality rates. In this regard some people say that medical technology is responsible to increase population growth, that would effect our economy and society. But one has to remember that these are just rare exceptions rather common facts.
To recapitulate, medical technology is the blessing for this society than a curse for mankind. Therefore, ideas that will bring benefits would be cordially welcomed.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 399, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...tancy. In this essay, I shall highlight some of the important features of this statement be...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'of the latest'.
Suggestion: of the latest
...n this contemporary world, introduction of latest medical procedures improve life expecta...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 193, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...dures. Thus, this would lead to decrease infant mortality rates. In this regard s...
^^
Line 5, column 331, Rule ID: AFFECT_EFFECT[6]
Message: Did you mean 'affect'?
Suggestion: affect
... increase population growth, that would effect our economy and society. But one has to...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, so, therefore, thus, as to
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1446.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 250.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.784 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97635364384 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.03282310727 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 150.0 139.433497537 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.580463131201 103% => OK
syllable_count: 459.9 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.0675920218 50.4703680194 113% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.230769231 104.977214359 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2307692308 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.61538461538 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216328579895 0.242375264174 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0781838088709 0.0925447433944 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0751315737146 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.131244051042 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0459296747466 0.0609392437508 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 53.1260098522 66% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.24 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.82 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 83.0 55.0591133005 151% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.