Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The importance of medical technology which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it beneficial while others reject of this notion. The substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. This essay will further elaborate my view for favoring both side positive and negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further elaborate this argument but the most important one stems for facts of this trend is that medicines live more time from normal life. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that medicines give proteins from normal food. Needless to say, that all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming one is that some medicines not good for health because it’s wrong reaction on our health. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of medical technology are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 281, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun in seems to be countable; consider using: 'many ins'.
Suggestion: many ins
...r health. Hence, it is apparent why are many in against of this trend. According to ...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so, thus, while, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 20.9802955665 119% => OK
Preposition: 25.0 31.9359605911 78% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1154.0 1207.87684729 96% => OK
No of words: 219.0 242.827586207 90% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.26940639269 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68337792471 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.602739726027 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 359.1 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 59.1332715284 50.4703680194 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.909090909 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9090909091 20.9669160288 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.81818181818 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0730216330885 0.242375264174 30% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0253846272674 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0301541961744 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0478573065497 0.151781067708 32% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00925600353068 0.0609392437508 15% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.29 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.