more books are available online, while library books are useless.agree or disagree?

Essay topics:

more books are available online, while library books are useless.agree or disagree?

In this tech-savvy era, myriad people are very much interested in reading Electronic Books than printed books. Some experts think that library books are useless, while others maintain that with the upcoming of online books, people feel easy to refer the materials through web. I wholeheartedly, agree with this notion. This essay will discuss despite significant downsides, online information has more positive benefits.

At the outset, with the prolific advancements of technology and Internet, people can refer to each information through online. With the different range of gadgets available, people can read books online. Furthermore, E-books are environment-friendly as it requires no papers. For example, students who would like to get more knowledge about any information can refer to the books available online with the touch of a button. Moreover, people can download E-books from internet from various websites.

On the other hand, E-books have made us more lethargic and unhealthy as people need to focus on computer or mobiles. Probing further, not every type of books are available in digital format. For example, some books are still available in paper format. Furthermore, people will loose books due to virus or technical errors.

To recapitulate, E-books play a prominent role in our daily life but we have to be more cautious. In my opinion, online information has more benefits as it can be accessed at any place of time.

Votes
Average: 7.2 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 278, Rule ID: LOOSE_LOSE[4]
Message: Did you mean 'lose' (= miss, waste, suffer the loss etc.)?
Suggestion: lose
... paper format. Furthermore, people will loose books due to virus or technical errors....
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, moreover, so, still, while, for example, in my opinion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1221.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.33187772926 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88355791959 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61135371179 0.580463131201 105% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.6636733322 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 81.4 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.2666666667 20.9669160288 73% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.33333333333 7.25397266985 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.362160425005 0.242375264174 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118970748296 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0531614644051 0.071462118173 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.204036772992 0.151781067708 134% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0520651162913 0.0609392437508 85% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.86 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 72.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.