“More information available online so library books are useless.” Agree or disagree with statement?
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in the availability of virtual information, reducing the value of physical books. There is widespread worry that it would lead to the myriad of concerns in the society. In my opinion, this apprehension is warranted and merits serious considerations.
There is a deluge of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that unlike online information, libraries books are the only source of getting authentic and reliable information. Not only can these books based on the thorough research with the proper bibliography but can also provide evidence of the authenticity of the facts written in them. Take scientific research, for instance, references from the library books are the only acceptable source for scientific research. Its hardly need mention that these merits stand library books in good stead as far as their usefulness is concerned.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that library books target a wide range of audience than online information. Besides, it gives an opportunity to engage the reader to his fullest. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favor of the notion that library books still hold a useful place in our lives instead of the availability of online information abundance.
In the view of arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of library books are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 493, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: It's; It is
...eptable source for scientific research. Its hardly need mention that these merits s...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, so, still, then, for instance, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1200.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 234.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12820512821 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91114542567 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87780455845 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.581196581197 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 389.7 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.4206568028 50.4703680194 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.0 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.5 20.9669160288 93% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.25 7.25397266985 86% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.178556343024 0.242375264174 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0567371144408 0.0925447433944 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0515672966386 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0982759359081 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.056053554286 0.0609392437508 92% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.5 12.6369458128 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.47 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.