"More information available online so library's
book are useless" or As e-books are available online
these days, the value of printed books has diminished.
Agree or disagree.
Recently, the phenomenon of e-books and its corresponding impact has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the paperless study is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that electronic information can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay. From a social standpoint, online libraries can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of learning online, as well as educational websites, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more enthusiasm. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both useless books and a wide variety of tastes apparently can be seen. Within the realm of science, online courses might increase the consequences of the less expenditure of commuting. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of cutting of the trees could relate to this reality that the demerits of environmental preservation pertain to air pollution. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of the ease of access is correlated negatively with the convenient exploitation. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of eliminating paper materials. To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of e-books far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of distance learning prove the significance of pervasive passion of students, but also pinpoint teaching facilities implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1625, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to prove'
Suggestion: to prove
... do the advantages of distance learning prove the significance of pervasive passion o...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1470.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58935361217 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.29052689744 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673003802281 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 476.1 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.6142169884 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.5 104.977214359 117% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.9166666667 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 1.0 4.12807881773 24% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0811888029784 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0258776696832 0.0925447433944 28% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0300514130872 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0811888029784 0.151781067708 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0 0.0609392437508 0% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 12.6369458128 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 33.24 53.1260098522 63% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 10.9458128079 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.14 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.1 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 107.0 55.0591133005 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.