ANY RECENT INVENTION THAT YOU THINK PROVED BENEFICIAL OR DETRIMENTAL TO SOCIETY.
Recently, the phenomenon of invention and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter if technological advancement is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that industrial attainment can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the detrimental inventor can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that the merits of the internet, as well as social media, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered more access to information. Thus, the beneficial ramifications of both broadcasting news and cell phones apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of science, beneficial inventions like high-speed networking might increase the consequences of risk of loss of data. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of privacy could rely on the reality that the demerits of mobile applications pertain to instant photography. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of devoting time to be with family members is negatively correlated with less exercise and obesity. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the prevalence of new equipment in medical centers and burgeoning health industry.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of pivotal role of new inventions in our life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of pervasive use of modern communication tools prove the significance of inevitable impacts, but also pinpoint the implications of aspiring desired future for next generations.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 191, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...f the internet, as well as social media, are inextricably bound up. According to ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1624.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 291.0 242.827586207 120% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58075601375 5.00649968141 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2755973368 2.71678728327 121% => OK
Unique words: 197.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676975945017 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 523.8 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7713559393 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 135.333333333 104.977214359 129% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.25 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0869228452543 0.242375264174 36% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0265778734852 0.0925447433944 29% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0303557332593 0.071462118173 42% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0440603593363 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0104608726623 0.0609392437508 17% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 30.2 53.1260098522 57% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.38 11.5310837438 133% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.23 8.32886699507 135% => OK
difficult_words: 118.0 55.0591133005 214% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.