"More information available online so library's
books are useless" or as e-books are available online
these days, the value of printed books has diminished.
Agree or disagree.
An issue which frequently generates a great deal of heated debate is the role of e-books in an individual’s life and is certainly discussed in this contemporary world. Many academics contend that advancement in technology and internet has provided people to get information online. This essay will express the complete agreement about this notion and will justify my viewpoints in upcoming paragraphs.
To commence with, there is a wide range of arguments to support the aforementioned statement; however, the most conspicuous one lies, in fact, is not remote and complicated but accessible and practical. It has long been considered perfectly justified by the proponents assumed that more and more e-books are getting released on the internet. Furthermore, it is asserted that it is the benefit for disable person as they can’t walk all the way to the library to read books and newspaper.
Another convincing fact to ascertain is spending excess time on laptops and computer can cause visual problems. Besides, it seems incontrovertible that due to e-books people are becoming lazier as they can sit for hours at home spending excess time on reading. However, the one who advocates this viewpoint fails to see the picture to a large extent. A relevant example is Nations worldwide have observed a dramatic shift in the opinion of the public regarding this issue.
To conclude, after pondering over a great deal of thoughts and deliberations with myself, I come to the conclusion that even there is some disadvantage of e-books its benefits are very useful to the present world. The advantage of e-books has overweighed the disadvantages.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 195, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...e to e-books people are becoming lazier as they can sit for hours at home spending...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, furthermore, however, if, regarding, so, in fact
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1395.0 1207.87684729 115% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.2641509434 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06911949621 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.633962264151 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 444.6 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.5280952887 50.4703680194 84% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.25 104.977214359 111% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.16666666667 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.130722776843 0.242375264174 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0446664163527 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0513999477657 0.071462118173 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0749442461159 0.151781067708 49% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0342853237212 0.0609392437508 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.23 11.5310837438 115% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 86.0 55.0591133005 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.